As Seen From the Rational Right

Tolerant Liberal Calls Juan Williams an Uncle Tom

When Williams pwns Ballantine around 5:45, he has no other rebuttal except to tell Williams to "go back to the porch."

True spirit of hateful liberals.

Keeping Race in the News By Design

     Have you noticed an influx of race related stories in the news lately?  It's not because they are happening more frequently, it's because they are being reported more frequently.  The design?  To keep racism as a motivation for Obama opposition a lingering thought in the minds of Americans.  Even if it's not true.  Just yesterday I read a story about how Obama made interracial marriages acceptable and later that night, a story about an interracial marriage being denied by one judge in La.  That's local news, not national news.  If you're conservative, be prepared because the national media is on board.  Being called a racist can end any debate, even if it's not true, and democrats have started a wide reaching campaign to keep race issues ever present in your mind.  The more you see stories of Obama trying to unite people and the more random and spread out stories you see regarding certain INDIVIDUALS being racist...the more likely you are to fall for their strategy that anyone who opposes Obama is a racist. 

    Now don't confuse me, I don't think all race related stories shouldn't be reported but when you're inundated with them all of the sudden when Obama is facing opposition they can get to be pretty annoying.  This country has become race obsessed and people have free range on calling everyone racist.

It's sickening.

Obama makes interracial marriages ok

La jude denies marriage to interracial couple

The intended message?  Obama, the great unifier still faces opposition from white people who can't stop hating.

The reality?  Someone subjectively inserted Obama into rising interracial marriage statistics that were on the rise before he even campaigned and some random judge (who apparently has done this before) told a couple it was against his personal beliefs and to go to another judge.  

Keep it mind, I'm not condoning what the judge did, I'm just saying it's not a national news story.

Punt the NFL

Sick of how the commish responded to the attach on Rush?

Boycott the NFL.

Show your support here:  Punt the NFL

Rick Sanchez's Only NFL Experience

CNN's Rick Sanchez had no shame in reciting fabricated Rush Limbaugh quotes as the leftist and statist MSM smeared Rush's attempt to bid on the Rams.  He would not apologize for the fabrications either.  What experience does Rick Sanchez even have in the NFL to bring any meaningful perspective to the debate?  Well he was driving drunk and hit someone with his car coming back from a Miami Dolphins game. 

From Redpills.org

"It happened on Dec. 10, 1990. Mr. Sanchez, seriously drunk behind the wheel, with his dad as passenger, was leaving a Miami Dolphins game. He had barely left the stadium parking area before he hit a man who was running between cars, and who (unfortunately) was also drunk. Undoubtedly helped by invisible friends on the police force, Sanchez was not charged with causing the accident, but was later charged with (and pleaded no contest to) DUI.

But here’s the cowardly part: Sanchez initially left the scene of the accident for 2 full hours. One local report said he first went home to get his license and fell asleep. (Yeah, right.)

Anyway, by the time he meandered back to the scene and his dilly-dallying cop friends
tested him for alcohol, it was at least four hours after the accident. Even with all his friends helping him, Sanchez’s blood still registered .15 — way above the then-legal-limit of .10."

The victim who was paralyzed from the incident died from complications in 1995.

Well I guess driving drunk from an NFL game and hitting an innocent person gives you credibility to discuss buying an NFL team.

Rick Sanchez...sick and evil.

Need Help From a Public Option Supporter

I'm serious, if you support a public option for healthcare please help me out.  How would I be able to keep my current plan with a public option?

Liberal Media, Just Completely Hateful

I've stated this in my previous post, but I find it funny that the liberal media will fact check an SNL skit but won't fact check or validate quotes that they assign to someone.  They are so hateful. 

One day they are whining about "civility" and the next day Chris Matthews is on MSNBC going crazy about Rush Limbaugh who is rich, successful and reaches millions more viewers than he can ever dream of.  So what about all this "violent rhetoric" guys?  Here's what Matthews says about Limbaugh:

"In the end they jammed a big CO2 pellet in his face, and he blew up.  I have to tell you, Rush Limbaugh is beginning to look more and more like Mr. Big.  And at some point somebody is going to jam a CO2 pellet into his head and he's going to explode like a giant blimp.  That day may come."

Wow, Matthews sounds intelligent.  That's some real sophisticated imagery. 

Now let's move on to the sexist attack on conservative blogger Michelle Malkin (who also reaches an absurd amount of people...how can the "fringe" consist of so many people?)  Here's what liberal idealist Keith Olbermann said about Malkin:

"fascistic hatred, without which Michelle Malkin would just be a big mashed-up bag of meat with lipstick on it."

Wow, that's violent AND sexist.  Sad.  The liberal media just cannot properly communicate or debate their opinions without using such hateful and violent language. 

I mean, Rush and Malkin reach tens of millions of people everyday, you know, fringe people.  That's why they sell so much advertising and Rush has a $400 million contract.  How can you earn almost a half billion dollars if you only speak to the fringe?  LOL. 

What I love best is the liberal bloggers, they love calling Rush a druggie or drug addict.  The man had a vice and he beat his drug addiction.  I thought liberals advocated rehabilitation and wanted to ease up on drug charges?  Don't be such hypocrites.  Because conservatives assign themselves to a higher moral standard, liberals love to jump on it everytime they slip up.  How can you be mad at a conservative HUMAN BEING who is obviously not perfect for engaging in behavior that you deem acceptable anyway?  

Maybe this little picture can better communicate my thought...here 

Hey Liberal Media, Can We Get a Fact-Check?

I don't feel like writing a whole piece about this so I'll be quick.  Rush Limbaugh is involved in a group bid to buy the St. Louis Rams.  Liberals who are perfectly ok with drunk driving murderers like Leonard Little (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Little), being a part of the NFL are adamantly against someone with different political views owning an NFL team.

So instead of providing facts, they assign two racist quotes to him that IN FACT, he never said.  They weren't misquoted...he just never said them.  The liberal media has not bothered to check the validity of the quotes, instead rely on a book "101 People Who Are Screwing Up America" for their source.  The quotes are listed on page 232 of the book but have no citation.  The author simply pulled them off of wikiquote which is a user generated content site with no sources. 

So basically, the liberal media, which will fact check an SNL skit, does not bother to validate quotes that could be very damaging to a person.

SICK and DISGUSTING.

The quotes in question?

"You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray (Dr. King's assassin). We miss you, James. Godspeed."

"Let's face it, we didn't have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: Slavery built the South. I'm not saying we should bring it back. I'm just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark."

No sources or audio clips available, just made up quotes. 

Rush is seeking legal action for retractions and apologies. 

Second Audio From Detroit Stimulus Line

    The laughing in the next audio is what startles me.  I'd be humiliated standing in line to get free money.  I would feel inadequate and helpless.  Then again, when you think it's called "Obama Money" and you have no clue that people who work have to pay for "Obama Money", you're not too worried about pride.  Now again, this goes deeper than the actual gesture of handing out a total of $15 million in stimulus money because really, that's a drop in the bucket of our budget and the stimulus.  It's the precedent that you set and it's the de-motivation of people who could otherwise be good workers in a better economy. 

    For all of the liberals out there with their hearts bleeding, they will say "well what is Obama supposed to do?"  I say, don't perpetuate a culture where people feel like the Government will be their safety net.  You eliminate incentive from the potential labor force and you are continuing a system where wealth is taken from productive sectors of the economy and given unproductive sectors WITHOUT THE PROSPECT OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THOSE UNPRODUCTIVE SECTORS.

Elaboration on Detroit Stimulus

Ok, this has got me absolutely fuming.  Let's go back to early 2009.  I will QUOTE Obama's pitch on the stimulus.  I mean, we were hours away from economic collapse, he needed to do this, right?

Obama, "To immediately jump start job creation as well as long term economic growth.  It's a plan that will save or create 3 to 4 million jobs over the next few years.  It's not just a short term program to boost employment, it's one that will invest in our most important priorities."

Let's fast forward to Fall 2009.  $15 million in stimulus was sent to Detroit, not for job creation but for welfare.  That's right.  The Government does not want people to work, they want them to be dependent.  People have no motivation to work when they know the Government will help them out and they don't even care where the money comes from.  Why should they?  Watch this video, the people are actually complaining about the logistics of getting FREE MONEY.  YOUR TAX DOLLARS. 

"We love you Obama."

Listen around 1:20, "The city has to take accountability for what's going on."  My point precisely.  It's a slippery slope, this lack of personal responsibility, once you start giving hand outs it's impossible to stop. 

Now you can view my anger as heartless or of course the liberal's old standby "racist", but it's neither.  I'm mad because not only is our country involved in a culture where we are made to believe that we should work to help other people out but because these people deserve better.  These people deserve an honest attempt at job creation.  This is counter productive to job creation.  We are letting people down when we help them barely keep their head above water with hand outs. 

Think Obamacare is the Answer?

Dick Morris reports:

"Tax the sick!

In a new amendment to the health care bill, they propose to limit the deductibility of medical expenses on income taxes.

Now, taxpayers may deduct any medical expenses that exceed 7.5% of their Adjusted Gross Income. Obama and Baucus want to raise that threshold to 10% as long as the taxpayer is under 65.

Eight million Americans are sick enough and poor enough that they have to pay more than 7.5% of their income in medical expenses. And it is these folks that the liberals Obama and Baucus plan to tax!

The Democrats defend their proposal by saying that it would discourage health care spending. But nobody deliberately spends 7.5% of their income on medical costs unless they are pretty sick and needy.

Obama and Baucus have singled out the sickest among the middle class for this heinous tax. (The poor will not have to pay it because they are eligible for Medicaid).

This tax, and their desire to cut Medicare and Medicaid by $500 billion, makes Obama and Baucus unlike any Democrats I have ever known. Democrats, at least when I worked for Clinton, defended the elderly and the sick rather than cut the former and tax the latter."

Wow, hmmmmm remember when Obama said he wouldn't introduce new taxes for anyone making under $250,000 per year?

YES WE CAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SAY IT LOUD.